GEL-CONTEND 9 -
Regular price OMR 50 Save OMR -50/
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Specs
Heel Drop
8 mm
Weight
274 g/9.7 oz
Support
Neutral
Cushion
cushion.regular
Pronation
Designed For NeutralUnderpronation

Neutral
-
Foot Type
Normal size arches -
Push Off
There is even distribution from the front of the foot. -
Considered Injuries
Less likely due to effective shock absorption, but neutral runners are not immune to injury. -
How your foot contacts the ground
The foot lands on outside of the heel, then rolls inward (pronates) to absorb shock and support body weight. -

Underpronation
-
Foot Type
High arches -
Push Off
The pressure is on smaller toes on outside of foot. -
Considered Injuries
Plantar fasciitis, shin splints, ankle strain. -
How your foot contacts the ground
The outer side of the heel hits the ground at an increased angle with little or no normal pronation, causing a large transmission of shock through the lower leg. -
Details
The GEL-CONTEND® 9 running shoe provides good cushioning, support, and durability.
An engineered mesh upper stretches with the foot's natural motion and creates a comfortable fit. Meanwhile, the synthetic stitching on the overlays helps create a more supportive foothold.
The midsole features GEL® technology and AMPLIFOAM+ cushioning. These technologies help increase durability while creating a softer feel underfoot.
Style #: 1011B881.002
UPC #: 197298471930
Tech & Materials
-
Rearfoot GEL® technology cushioningImproves impact absorption and creates a softer feeling at footstrike
-
Jacquard mesh upperImproves airflow
-
OrthoLite™ socklinerOffers excellent step-in comfort
-
Flex grooves in the outsoleImproves flexibility
-
Synthetic stitching on the overlaysImproves support
-
AMPLIFOAM+ cushioningHelps improve durability
-
GUIDANCE LINE™ technologyProvides a more consistent stride
-
At least 20% of the shoe’s main upper material is made with recycled materials to reduce waste and carbon emissions
-
The sockliner is produced with the solution dyeing process that reduces water usage by approximately 33% and carbon emissions by approximately 45% compared to the conventional dyeing technology

